![]() It is sometimes claimed, indeed, that the existence of a certain sort of regularity in nature constitutes sufficient evidence for the existence of a god. And in that case it would be possible to deduce from it, and other empirical hypotheses, certain experiential propositions which were not deducible from those other hypotheses alone. For if the existence of such a god were probable, then the proposition that he existed would be an empirical hypothesis. ![]() ![]() ![]() “What is not so generally recognized is that there can be no way of proving that the existence of a god, such as the God of Christianity, is even probable. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |